well we have more than one that has burned waste motor oil in a changfa
one of which (david) reports over 5k hours of dependable operation and his
engine continues to work as designed.
you summarily dismiss this report, yet we are to believe everything that come out of your
mouth as "fact".
come on spencer, debating you is very much like playing cards with a 2 year old, you start to lose the game and simply change the rules.
lets stay on point shall we?
how about more specific details about your application, what engine specifically? what condition before and after, what kind of wmo? what operating conditions, temperatures, load level? etc. how often did you decarbon when burning wmo?
either start to put out some details or go back to your corner, you are becoming quite tedious.
something perhaps you can answer, whether you will or not is yet to be seen...
why aren't you more interested in the mechanism/chemistry that answers the question as to why your engine failed at relatively low hours burning wmo?
it would seem to me that a reasonably intelligent guy such as yourself would just have an inborn, genetic coded, need to know what happened specifically, and how it might have been avoided or how to extend the lifespan of the engine.
i suppose it would be a much easier life to lead, simply accepting everything at face value, everything that pops up first as being indisputable fact, and moving on. i suppose it might be much simpler not to give things serious thought, and do research to find solutions to problems, much easier to scream the sky is falling rather than actually do something about it.
i suppose your mind is made up, so no sense wasting time with facts huh?
oh yes, i almost forgot,, you have your facts don't you.
too bad they exclude all other possible explanations.
i suspect we will find the answer to these and other questions, likely without your help
so don't waste your valuable time actually doing something other than spouting the same stuff over and over again.
kind of sad really
bob g