Author Topic: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels  (Read 7705 times)

LowGear

  • Casey
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2131
  • What? My diesel had fries for lunch?
    • View Profile
"Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« on: April 16, 2009, 06:06:40 PM »
My local small diesel engine dealer tells me real diesels, those with more than 19:1 compression, get better fuel economy and are better machines.  Is he just full of it or has he got a valid case?

Casey

NPR Tipper/Dump Truck
Kubota BX 2230
Witte BD Generator
SunnyBoy 6000 + SolarWorld 245

compig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1264
  • 1953 Lister CS 6/1 SOM owner
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2009, 06:26:05 PM »
Higher compression ratio = higher efficiency.
DON'T STEAL , THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T LIKE COMPETITION !!!
Lister A
Onan W3S Genny
Petter A1
Villiers C45 industrial
Continental flat six powerpacket
ANOTHER Lister 6/1 CS SOM , temporarily !!!

mobile_bob

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2940
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2009, 06:48:57 PM »
not necessarily true

there certainly are real diesels that run at 11.6:1 (ntc400 cummins albeit turbo)

the changfa s195 idi is 20:1, but
the varient di engine is 15.5:1 and uses less fuel per hp or kwatt

efficiency in theory goes up with comp ratio, along with other things like friction
so you get to a point of diminished returns

generally good design dictates using no higher compression ratio than that needed to provide
for ease of starting, in the climate the engine is targeted for, burning the fuels that are commonly available.

there is a lot more to efficiency than compression ratio, so raising it chasing the last bit of efficiency
is likely the last path i would take.

millions of real diesels have been built that run in the 15:1 ratio range, with as many below as there is above
i would expect.

bob g
otherpower.com, microcogen.info, practicalmachinist.com
(useful forums), utterpower.com for all sorts of diy info

compig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1264
  • 1953 Lister CS 6/1 SOM owner
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2009, 07:41:44 PM »
I should have said generally speaking and assuming otherwise good design.
DON'T STEAL , THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T LIKE COMPETITION !!!
Lister A
Onan W3S Genny
Petter A1
Villiers C45 industrial
Continental flat six powerpacket
ANOTHER Lister 6/1 CS SOM , temporarily !!!

PaulMoffenger

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2009, 12:36:28 AM »
Hello,
Typically the only diesels that are above 18:1 are Indirect injected or Naturally aspirated direct injected (not many either).

Paul

lowspeedlife

  • old iron for a new age
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 726
  • no i'm not no cowboy
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2009, 10:27:53 PM »
I'd say that's his opinion & you know what they say about opinions. everybody's got one & most of them stink!. some guys would say "real" diesels are water cooled, some would say they are multi cylinder & blown or turboed. Rudolph's first engine surely wasn't 19 to 1 compression, so i'd ignore him unless he's got sum'thin you want.
    Scott R.
Scott R.

5.7 liter diesel k-5 blazer. converting to wvo.
omega 20/2 listeroid

LowGear

  • Casey
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2131
  • What? My diesel had fries for lunch?
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2009, 03:18:59 AM »
Sage advice Scott R.
NPR Tipper/Dump Truck
Kubota BX 2230
Witte BD Generator
SunnyBoy 6000 + SolarWorld 245

compig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1264
  • 1953 Lister CS 6/1 SOM owner
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #7 on: April 24, 2009, 11:20:57 AM »
Just checked the CR of my Citroen common rail turbo diesel , 18:1. The NA version is 21.8:1.  It's all dependant on the overall design. The early diesels were probably unable to use high CR's due to the metallurgy of the time and the difficulty then in making high pressure injection pumps.
DON'T STEAL , THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T LIKE COMPETITION !!!
Lister A
Onan W3S Genny
Petter A1
Villiers C45 industrial
Continental flat six powerpacket
ANOTHER Lister 6/1 CS SOM , temporarily !!!

Quinnf

  • Rest in peace
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 645
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2009, 02:48:36 PM »
That's what Rudolf Diesel thought, too.  He experimented extensively with high compression ratios and found to his surprise that waht worked best for overall efficiency was to have the compression ratio only high enough to ensure reliable initiation of combustion.  It wasn't a case of metallurgy, but one of combustion engineering.

You can read all about it in detail in http://www.amazon.com/Diesels-Engine-Lyle-Jr-Cummins/dp/0917308034 written by Lyle Cummins.  It's a good read.

Quinn
Ashwamegh 6/1, PowerSolutions 6/1 "Kit" engine, and a Changfa R175a that looks like a Yanmar I once knew

compig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1264
  • 1953 Lister CS 6/1 SOM owner
    • View Profile
Re: "Real" diesels vs. "Kinda" diesels
« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2009, 06:43:54 PM »
I suppose there is going to be an optimum CR for a given engine design. Thanks for the book tip , I'll buy a copy.
DON'T STEAL , THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T LIKE COMPETITION !!!
Lister A
Onan W3S Genny
Petter A1
Villiers C45 industrial
Continental flat six powerpacket
ANOTHER Lister 6/1 CS SOM , temporarily !!!