Tom:
thanks for the link
although i sure would not use that report as support of much of anything
there is no testing protocol, no results, not much of anything to support an assertion
much less prove the concept.
Sandia Labs have done tons of research, on batteries of all types, double blind tests etc
by 2000-2001 they had not found clear and convincing evidence that desulfators worked at all.
although i have read this last year that they now conclude that there might possibly be a benefit in using one
on a heavily sulfated battery. (the operative words being "might" and "possibly")
what i would like to see is a study or test done wherein a large group of batteries are brought together for testing
all from the same installation, all the same type, age, size etc.
run them down, let them set and harden the sulfation and then divide them up between to protocols
one being the standard the other being a desulfator
maybe 50 batteries each, and afterwards do a series of load and capacity tests on each group.
perhaps even have the test guys blind to which technology he is charging with.
the thing is, most folks that use a desulfator pay a much higher level of attention to the charging of their batteries
than to those with standard chargers ... generally.
usually a guy gets interested in a desulfator because he has a battery with a problem. so he is paying alot of attention to the battery.
according to sandia labs earlier tests on both technologies they conclude the same, more attention equals a better result
if you set the charge voltage sufficiently high enough it will break down the crystalized sulfation over time in a normal process.
anyway, thanks for the link
perhaps you or others have more links to university studies, independant lab studies or something like that
i would like to read them.
bob g