I've searched all over and while I can find plenty of topics that mention safety in passing , the only real one that even begins to present the risks involved is Guy_Fawke's "How to kill yourself with a listeroid", and that sort of went to pieces pretty quick.
But it's something that needs to be addressed. There are a lot of people - like me - that are new to the game. There are a lot of people who have - after years of working around listers - become a bit jaded about the safety issues.
Please, if you think I'm preaching to the choir, don't say anything at all here unless you're here to help. I'm really trying to keep this one focused.
Quite a few posts about the place seem to hint that people have never done anything like this type of risk analysis before. I want you guys to post any questions you've got as we go along.
So, I'll start the ball rolling. This is a thread that will be used to help you identify hazards and courses of action to reduce the likelyhood and consequences of them. I'll work over the common hazards,
but by no means is this the definitive list of hazards on a machine. You're machine will vary from mine, and you might have some nast hazards that I don't. So keep an open mind , and an eye out.
I've lifted bits of this verbatim from our training manual here at work, so take that in mind when it talks about "Business interruption"
Ok, what the heck is Risk Management?
It's the process of
1. Identifying hazards in the work area
2. Assessing the risk posed by them
3. Implementing effective controls to reduce the risk posed by them
4. Reviewing the effectiveness of the controls on a continual basis
Ok, so what the heck is a hazard?
A hazard is something that has the potential to cause injury, damage to equipment, environmental impact or business interruption.
Ooook, so what the heck is a control?
A control is something that reduces the exposure to the hazard. On the one extreme, you can get rid of the hazard completely by some method, that's the most effective control . On the other extreme, you could put up a sign that says "anyone going near those spinning flywheels will be reprimanded". That's a poor control because it depends on the person. And you can never depend on the person.
I'll now post this:
Normal copy here:
http://listerengine.com/coppermine/albums/userpics/10075/risk%20card.jpgYes, I lifted it from work and yes, I have permission from our safety manager there to use this image.
This card can be used not only for risk of injury, but machinery damage and environmental risks as well.
Now, how to control all these hazards that we've identified as big risks?
Use this :
Normal copy here:
http://listerengine.com/coppermine/albums/userpics/10075/Controls.jpgThis lists the controls from most effective to least effective. I'll give examples:
Eliminate: The best choice, obviously. Remove the hazard... no hazard.
Substitution: Can we do something some other way, or can we get a part that doesn't have that hazard with it?
Engineering/Isolation: Engineering - Making something strong enough that it doesn't fly off and come to you. Isolation- Keep you away from the moving bits by guards.
Administration/Training: Procedures to do something, training on how to do it.
Personal Protective Equipment: Safety hats, gloves, glasses , aprons, earmuffs.
Behaviour Management: "Keep away , or you'll be reprimanded"
Now, posting the list of hazards from Guy_Fawke's thread, and a few more:
1) Large stored energy in rapidly moving open flywheels.
2) Massive and top heavy. Obvious handling issues, in whole, or in parts.
3) Exposed Belts.
4) AC power.
5) Hot bits. Coolant, Oil, Exhaust
6) Bits that pinch , as opposed to rip off. Exposed valve train, internal gears and parts.
7) Stored fuel in the area, fuel near hot surfaces. Inevitable leaks. Risk of fire.
8 ) Exhaust issues. Noisy and dangerous gasses.
9) High pressure from injection pump.
The way we do it at work is two-fold :
- an assessment method where we just look at the whole machine and see what the dangers are. I'd use that list above as a start.
- an assessment method that's task-based.
I'll use the task-base method as an example.
So today's task to work on reducing the hazards is starting the machine.
What can go wrong? We'll go through the steps in the task.
Reduce each step down to a single action or actions in a similar area. Don't combine actions (eg. setting the fuel rack/decompression and winding it over). Setting the fuel rack/decompression can be considered as a "Setting up for cranking" action as they're in a similar place on the machine.
Ok, Step 1 in starting the engine:
1. I grab the crank-handle and walk to the machine.
STOP. Have a look at your surroundings? Is it dark? Wet? Full of junk? My areas well lit and dry, but it's full of junk.
Could I trip over some piece of junk in my cluttered workshop? Yes. That's a hazard then.
So I get out my little chart and work out a risk score.
Likelyhood? For my place, about once a month. There's crap everywhere. I look up the chart, and thats a "B"
Consequence? I go arse-up and knock my head. That could be a lost time injury - a "3" (ie. Hospital and a day off work)
Risk score? Where B and 3 intersect - 17.
That's a high risk. What to do about it? Looking at the control pyramid, the top one is to eliminate the hazard ie. tidy up the damn shop. I could use some of the other methods from the pyramid, but eliminating is the best one as there's no hazard after that. I could wear a crash helemet (personal protective equipment) , but that doesn't reduce the likelyhood of it happening, only the consequence that I'll get hurt.
So anyway, I tidy the shop. An hour later and the place is a lot better. Now to double check.
Likelyhood? For my tidied-up place, it's unlikely. So I'll make it "D".
Consequence? I could still hit my head. If I lined the place with pillows or wore a crash helmet, the consqeuence would be reduced. Don't get fooled on this bit. I've cleaned the workshop and reduced the likelyhood of going arse up, but the consequence of me going arse up is still there - a sore head. Still a "3" then.
Now people have differing ideas about likelyhood and consquence, but it's really up to you. You should really do this with a couple of other people to get a consensus, and to stop you becoming blinded to hazards.
Looking that up again gives me a risk score of 9 - it's been reduced to a moderate risk.
So I've reduced the risk of walking over to the machine. Good. That's a start.
I'm going to pause here, because I've got things to do elsewhere, but I'll leave the next step in the task out in the open, if anyone wants to give this a go :
Step 2. Checking fuel/oil/water and engine settings (eg fuel and decompression).
What are the hazards associated with those tasks, what is each hazard's risk score and what can you do to reduce that risk score?