Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cujet

Pages: 1 ... 54 55 [56] 57 58 ... 63
826
I imported 3 GTC engines. 2 are up and running, and the one I kept (the worst one) is still a basket case (I got the bad parts from all 3 engines). I spent all day (and I mean ALL DAY)  yesterday removing casting sand from the block. 1 1/2 cups worth! This stuff was painted over, but was easy to spot. In almost every corner or web, the casting sand was not removed. In some spots it was 3/4 of and inch thick!

Previously, I also discovered a crack in the block on the lower most edge, located on the access cover side. It had been welded in India and then filled with putty. The weld is cracked, but the block seems OK. I added an angle iron strap with Hysol structural epoxy and many structural aircraft screws. It should be strong!

 What was once a viable design has been improved upon by India and now suffers in nearly every way to the original. I have serious regrets with my engine and with Listeroids in general.

Here are some of the major points.

1) Cracked Block
2) Large casting voids in flywheels
3) Casting Sand, in large quantities
4) Corrosion in cyl bore.
5) Scoring in other cyl bore
6) Crankshaft finish beyond unacceptable. Ruined bearings
7) Crankshaft counterweight casting flaws resulting in 1000g less weight on one bob weight
8 ) Connecting rod bushing had 1mm clearance to rod! It was peened to fit (you would not believe it even if you saw it!)
9) Other connecting rod mismatch on big end bearing halfs. (un-usable)
10) etc!

I have said enough.

Chris

827
Listeroid Engines / Re: Upping the HP on a 6/1
« on: June 19, 2006, 04:45:54 AM »
Guy, I think you are wrong on the tuned intake/exhaust issue. However, I am not sure, as I have no such data on Listeroids. 

But if I remember correctly, the VE of a listeroid is about 75%. That means there is potential to reach 100% VE with tuned runners.

If you remember correctly, most automotive applications of tuned runners are 4th order. In other words, even more power could be had with runners 2 or 4 times as long as what is currently used.

While it could be absurd in length, a listeroid application specific tuned intake and exhaust would probably enable 100+ VE.

This could result in a substantial power gain.

Chris

828
Not so sure on that IGN situation you describe, Guy. I have some limited experience (4 years) with a Westinghouse Knock engine. It had a variable compression ratio and could achieve about 13 to 1 in original form. We did some minor mods to achieve 20 to 1 to test various fuels. The original IGN system was capable of lighting it off at all times. And that was a points and condensor system. By the way, this engine was shut off by an ignition switch! It is true that it takes more voltage to jump a gap as the pressure increases. However it is OK to make that gap smaller!

I also have plenty of high compression race car engne expereince. The typical NA maximum is about 14.5 to 1 on race gas. However there are plenty of turbocharged race engines operated at very high boost levels. Manifold pressures as high as 75 PSI are possible. I currently run a 9.5 to 1 turbo engine on 23PSI boost with near 100% VE. That equates to well more than a 20 to 1 effective compression ratio. And I am using OEM Mazda coil packs with an aftermarket ECU driving them.

Chris

829
Listeroid Engines / Re: Semi Closed loop... Anyone tried it?
« on: June 02, 2006, 07:19:42 PM »
Thank you for the fantastic, thought provoking post!

I have plenty of experience with bizzare engines. Smokey Yunik's shop was right down the street from my house in the 80's. I used to visit from time to time. Always liked what he was up to. He was able to achieve some incredible things. Yes there were some problems and issues. These could be worked out with today's computer controls.

I like your setup, better pics would be really nice. I agree that things do not have to be good looking to be effective!

Have you thought about a spring loaded exhaust port to keep the system pressure up? How about using the crankcase compression to provide the pressurized air. 2 piston strokes are available in the crankcase for every intake event.

Chris

830
Listeroid Engines / Re: No Rotation on inlet valve tappet
« on: May 21, 2006, 01:34:58 PM »
I machined mine on a lathe. Here are the tricks I used to get it right and end up with good surface finish.

1) Low lathe RPM (90)
2) Very high tool post grinder RPM (25K)
3) Silicon Carbide fine grit stone produces the best finish (available at Sears)
4) Polish normally on a Scotch Brite wheel.

Any deviation from this and I was not able to get a decent surface finish.

I have also heard that a surface grinder will do a great job.



Some have used an "O" ring or rubber band between the tappets to transfer the rotation of one tappet to the other. I have seen this work!

Chris

831
Listeroid Engines / Re: Cylinder Wear
« on: May 03, 2006, 07:15:24 PM »
Are the Indian copies chrome plated also?

It would seem that India could get away with a good industrial chrome application without worries about EPA and other regs. Maybe the electrical power to do the chrome is expensive in India.

Chris

832
Listeroid Engines / Re: Cylinder Wear
« on: May 03, 2006, 01:43:03 PM »
Some engines have a removable liner. Some have the cylinder cast into the cylinder block. I wonder which is best. Certainly the liner quality can be controlled better. 1500 Hours with noticable wear is absurd. These engines turn so slow that the number of cycles can be easily calculated and understood.

1500 hours = 58 million cycles at 650RPM contrast that with the expected lifespan of better than 3 billion cycles for a modern diesel engine. Your engine lifespan is looking like roughly 3% of modern engines.



The original Lister CS had specially chrome plated liners. This was part of the reason for long life.

Chris

833
Listeroid Engines / Re: Broken Gib keys
« on: May 01, 2006, 03:17:14 PM »
Looks like you sheared off the key. This is why I made my own gib key puller with 4 bolts to tension the device and a slide hammer to break it loose. That way no stress risers are placed on the key itself. Just a smooth surface applying the pressure.

I made it out of iron pipe with a slot milled in the end. Welded on some steel to pull the key, while leaving enough room to install the device.

Chris

834
Listeroid Engines / Re: Oil Pressure
« on: May 01, 2006, 03:13:32 PM »
5PSI is about right. The piston type pump actuates at camshaft RPM, so one squirt per 2 revolutions of the crankshaft is all you get. Peak squirt pressure (measured with a fast reacting gauge) may be 15PSI. Also, you could rig up a check valve on the gauge to only read the peak. You will need a bleed valve to bleed off the pressure after taking a reading.

Chris

835
Hey Dirtbikepilot, Alcohol is used in many things to boost HP. The octane is higher than gasoline (a big plus) and it contains oxygen (also a big plus). Certainly it contains less energy than gasoline by standard measures, such as by the gallon or by the pound. However, one can simply use more alcohol to get the mixture right. When this is done, the net effect is more HP.

JR dragsters are the most simple example I can think of. On gasoline with a stock Briggs they make 5HP. Using alcohol (methanol) with no other changes other than jetting reportedly brings the HP up to around 7 or 8. Adding a big alcohol compatable Mikuni carb, advancing the timing (necessary with high octane) using a trick high compression piston and hot cam bring the HP way into the double digits. Going even further, on that same fuel with more serious mods (racing block, crank, rod, flywheel, head etc) has achieved mid 50's in the HP dept. AND, that is on straight alcohol.

Same with dirt bikes. Often times the fast ones are running alcohol. 2 stroke engines will make 30% more power on alcohol.

Chris

836
Listeroid Engines / Re: The mystery of low compression
« on: May 01, 2006, 01:29:32 AM »
I saw the engine run. It sure seemed to me like the number one cylinder was low on compression. However, it may be something else. I was thinking about all sorts of things. Maybe the valve is being held open a bit too long? Maybe CC volume? Maybe injector? Just guessing.

Chris

837
Lister Based Generators / Re: Another pulley size question
« on: April 23, 2006, 03:31:45 PM »
I guess that all will be fine at the lower RPM's as long as you have enough lubrication.

There was at least one Lister clone that failed at low RPM due to lack of oil.

Chris

838
Listeroid Engines / Re: Listeroid Ballence mis understood
« on: April 18, 2006, 01:40:42 AM »
Now, that was a great post Gerry!

Chris

839
Listeroid Engines / Re: Center bearing lube requirements
« on: April 18, 2006, 01:38:06 AM »
Guy. that was slightly off topic. However you make a good set of points.

I agree that the Listeroid type engine is probably not the ideal engine to go off grid with. There are just too many quality issues.


Chris

840
Listeroid Engines / Re: To LISTEROIDUSA Emmissions
« on: April 17, 2006, 04:11:07 AM »
How about converting these engines to run on liquid Propane? Couple that with EGR and the standards may be easier to meet. LP can work in a diesel with something to light it off.

Chris

Pages: 1 ... 54 55 [56] 57 58 ... 63