Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ixtow

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
3/ computers and the net

#3 is the one that would really hurt.

Even old laptops are power-misers compared to a desktop.  Check ebay for the rare models that use a Transmeta Crusoe or Efficeon Processor.  If you're rich, opt for one of the new Dells with that new Intel Core Solo chip.  I'll take the Transmeta.  Some of Sharp Transmeta designs pull less poer than your T8 Ballasted bulbs when power management is aggressive.  They usually have 12V car adapters too.

I use an old Toshiba Portege 7200CTe.  It doesn't sip the juice as mildly as the Sharp Actius MM machines do, but wattage-wise, it beats the living crap out of my desktop systems.

32
On topic reply.

I don't think I'd want to depend on burning fossil fuel as a primary anything.  There's plenty of energy falling from the sky, and blowing in the wind.  Solar and Wind + Grid Tie would be my first choice.  But then again, I want to live far enough away from The Humans that I doubt there will be a grid to tie to.  I'd rather let Solar/Wind keep my Batteries up, and pull out the Lister for heavy usage.

Maintainability is very important off-grid.  A lister certainly fits the bill for a generator.

I haven't seen any DC ST gen heads around lately...  I'd rather have stuff I can get common parts for.  That puts building a custom engineered 94.7036VDC Refrigerator out of the question too...  If you keep your batteries near your refrigeration (opposite sides of a utility room wall, less than 3 foot copper run), there are some very efficient 12-24VDC refrigerators out there.  Not only does it eliminate DC/AC conversion losses for this 24/7/365 application, it also cuts down on inverter demand.

33
Giggle....

34
I don't beleive _I_ said it can't be done.  Just that when one must be an energy-miser, even a few percentage points count.  I can mow the yard with my teeth, it just isn't very efficient, and thusly, not very smart when one's goal is to be efficient...  You can say it all day long, and it still won't become true.  I suppose I could find a way to run a Lister on Flatulance.  You can find a way to do just about anything...  That doesn't make it efficient.

I don't really care what you believe.  I respond to your posts only to let you know that I read it, and still don't care.

35
I thoroughly and completely disagree.  Science has proven this one already.  My personal experience also agrees with this.

12V DC at 40A will have much less net power loss than 120V at 4A, true.  120VAC at 4A will be even less (tho not by a large margin), and thinner wire to achieve it.  Not to mention that Induction or any sort requires AC.  I don't think he's going to build a 120V DC Battery Bank.  There's a darn good reason why the entire industry stays away from this.  And it's not just beacause DC electrocutes elephants easier.......

Finding DC appliances in that voltage range will be quite the crusade.

Technically, it's about 6 of one, half-dozen of the other.  As for how hard it will be to find stuff to run on 120VDC, heavilly favors AC and a few low-volt DC appliances.

I've no need get into another fight here.  Science is Science, it can't be argued with.  I'm just trying to help the guy.

36
Take a page from solar power.  DC has much higher resistive losses, especially low voltage high-current like 12-24v.  You main drop from a Solar Array will be less than 10 feet whenever possible, and the wire will be HUGE.  And we're usually talking about less than 1KW.

While converting to AC with inverters is not terribly efficient; DC Low Volt is even worse.  It may do away with conversion losses, but resistive losses are maddening.  You end up having to run VERY heavy wire for any useful wattage (Motors).  You could spend almost as much money on double-aught copper wire, as you would on inverters.  And still end up being less efficient.  Same reason why The Power Grid uses AC not DC.

Off-grid equipment has a purpose and is not motivated by throw-away economics.  Inverters exist for a reason.  Off-grid is spendy already, they don't jack up the cost of a system by 30% with inverters becasue they enjoy scaring off customers.

37
Listeroid Engines / Re: To LISTEROIDUSA Emmissions
« on: May 05, 2006, 04:25:57 PM »
The propane is injected through a fogger nozzle in the intake track so no additional oil is needed to lube anything. 

Easy way to think of it:

Propane is to Diesel as Nitrous-Oxide is to Gas.

38
General Discussion / Re: Not Lister Related
« on: May 01, 2006, 04:18:21 AM »
I'd like to have another diesel but in Gali-fornia they're verboten unless you can find one with over 7500 miles and bring it in as a used car.

Oh gawd, you're going to have to tell me about this one...  I love hearing stories about Kalifornia Laws...  It's always a hoot!  :-P

39
Listeroid Engines / Re: Any Conclusions Reached?
« on: April 29, 2006, 05:59:00 AM »
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson

http://www.thehomegunsmith.com

40
General Discussion / Re: Not Lister Related
« on: April 29, 2006, 01:15:42 AM »
Whew, finally!

41
General Discussion / Re: Not Lister Related
« on: April 28, 2006, 07:46:13 PM »
I assumed as much.  The fans not turning on seemed kinda odd tho.

Thanks, time to spend the next 12 hours unbolting unrelated fuel system crap so I can get to it...

42
General Discussion / Not Lister Related
« on: April 28, 2006, 05:58:53 PM »
I'm posting this here, even tho it's automotive, cuz ya'll seem like you've probably tinkered with a few cars in your day too.

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme.

I keeps overheating, but just barely.  If I rev up the engine, it cools off.....

I checked coolant level.  Peachy, it's full.

I took apart the water pump, becasue it's really easy to do on this car, and is easy to get to.  No problems there, spins free and smooth.

I started it up, and the coolant line coming out of the engine never gets warm.  I'm thinking thermostat (which I would normally check before water pump), but I can't get to the bastard without tearing the top half of the engine apart.

But, I noticed something else.  As the temp gauge is approaching "oh shit," the cooling fans on the radioator never turn on.  NEVER.  Do they have a seperate temp sensor on the hot side (maybe mounted to the radiator) that is not tripping because the coolant isn't moving??  If so, anomoly explained.  Dig for the Thermostat.  Or, am I looking at a bigger/different problem than the thermostat?

I'm hesitant to do as much work as is needed to reach the thermostat, just to discover that it's not the problem.  Is there soemthing 'special' that I don't know about this system?

I'm not familiar with this vehicle, it's only been in my care for a few weeks.  Anyone got experience with this system?  Input is appreciated.

43
Listeroid Engines / Re: Decarboning
« on: April 26, 2006, 04:14:03 PM »
I run my engines with an Acetone mix of 0.3floz/gal to 1floz/gal.  Depending on the size of the engine.  None of them are Listers, but they're still internal combustion/diesel

Carbon is a non-person to my engines.  Plugs (for the gas ones) and valves show no signs at all.  Exhaust pipe exit slowly looses that black stuff and turns a light bronze/gold color.  Combusion chamber/cylinder/piston are beautiful and shiny.  Also, my injector nozzles could be mistaken for New after only 157,000 miles....  She may take 50-W20, but still purrs at 600rpm idle.  It runs so smoothe, if I didn't have a tach, I wouldn't know it was running at all.

I swear by Acetone.  I've dumped it into cars that were so gummed up they would barely run.  After 3 tanks with 1floz/gal, they start up without a complaint and run like a different engine entirely.  I've seen many suspected "serious engine problems" entirely rectified by adding acetone to the juice.  It was merely gummed up THAT bad.

I'm not sure how well it would work in thicker WVO, etc...  But it's the best cleansing additive I've ever found for dino...

I'm sure some know-it-all will tell you Acetone will disolve all kinds of fuel system parts, etc...  It has the same solvency properties as Petro, just stronger.  It's NOT an octane booster, but when it thins the mix it promotes a more complete and cleaner burn that often has a mild effect on output torque/power.  No thermal increase at these small amounts.

44
so your definition of a perfect example is not in fact anything to do with the dictionary definition, eg "a parallel or closely similar case especially when serving as a precedent or model" but your own special definition of "one that makes my position right"

I beleive I pointed out how you're the one doing this.  Throwing it back in my face in the predicted "I know you are but what am I" fashion, does not add anytihng to your rapidly diminishing credibility.  Especially since you've shown yourself to be the one doing it, and not me.  Even in your very own words.

I am replying to this for only one reason.  To let you know that I read it.  You're simply not worth talking to anymore.  I could have a more useful conversation with a box of hammers.

I shall take comfort in an old addage: "Do not argue with an idiot. They will only drag you down to their level and win by 'experience'"

I will appologize to the rest of the forum tor being too small a man to just let this jackass have the last word.  I feel a civic obligation to bash desciples of stupidity.  Take his advice and go pour water in your crankcase, it's obviously less corrosive than that silly old oil we've been using...  Clearly there is nothing I can do or say to help anyone here.  I'll jsut lurk and let the admin continue this farce.

45
Oh I couldn't help myself.  Broken promises....

So, to sum up your post.

1/ serpentine belts are superior to vee belts because your mustang belt lasted three times as long as your toyota belt

lets start with point #1

in OUR applications the belt is always doing a constant speed, probably around 45 mph, a car belt can do 100 mph, and the speed is never constant, but always varying, as are the loads, your example is even worse, because you are comparing two different vehicles, and we know nothing about either, maintenance, set up, nothing

It's a perfect example, you just don't like it because it defeats your perspective and shows you're speaking from a posterior oriface not intended to be spoken from.

1) if it lasted so well in my Mustang, and countles other cars: how can the slow speed, wide radius pulleys, and constant RPM of a Listeroid do anyhting but improve?

2) V-belts are often an UPGRADE to equipment that uses v-belts.  the reasons are well documented and so widely known that it is common knowledge.  Their efficiency and durability is improved by the environment just mention in "1", but still do not surpass Serpentine belts.  Period.

Anyone with eyes and ears can easily discover that this is a heavilly supported trend.  It's such a blatant and established fact, there's no point in even talking about it.  Serpentines are jsut better.  Not leaps and bounds better, due to the improvement that a v-belt has in this application, but still better.  Sure, v-belts have been around a long time, and serviced many an application....

I can Carpet Bomb, or I can Send a Cruise Missile.  Both get the job done.  One just has fewer negative side-effects.

V-Belts suck less in "this application."  But the Serpentine is still better.  If it is better in an environement we already know is much worse.......  A 'nicer' environemnt can only improve this.  It's not paples to Oranges.  It's Good Apples to Bad Apples.

You don't need to know anything else about my car, or how I maintain it.  you never asked for any such information when you condemned Serpentine Belts, and told me that Oil is bad for my engine, especially the Oil Pump...  What would be the point in telling you about it?  You deny the clearest logic available to you, so why should I bother presenting it?

2/ because you oil your tools all oil is good and protective

lets take point #2

in OUR applications the oil is a self contained recirculating lube system, so it not only lubes and cools, but also carries away combustion by products, metal wear particles, and of course crank case condensate, in ever increasing proportions until it gets changed, lister and listeroids do not operate on a total loss two stroke lubrication system, so yet again your example bears precisely zero relevance to the points in question here.
[/qoute]

If this is so terrible, why do we still use it?  It is a perfect example of how you suggest the best tool for a job (oil for lubrication), which is widely known, is somehow a terrible idea.  If Oil in my engine is so freakin' terrible, you must be suggesting that I not use it.  Please, provide a superior alternative.  Tell me why nothing better is widely used?  Should I run my engines dry?  Use Water instead?  Please.  It is entirely relevant.  Again, you jsut don't like it becasue, for some inexplicable reason, proven fact just doesn't cut it for you.

The best known available solutions are just bad becasue the Original Design didn't have them?  I think the Original Listers required Oil for lube.  As for the serp, I've seen plenty of old equipment upgraded to a serpentine drive, specifically because it is longer lasting and more efficient.  Experience proves it.  Math proves it.  Physics proves it.  Millions of Practical applications in the field prove it.  It's is an established fact beyond the reach of any opinion or argument.

Both your cars seat 4 adults, and probably average 30 mpg, so from this, according to your logic, a lister must also seat four adults and achieve 30 mpg

incidentally, both of your cars have lube oil pumps that are not immersed in the sump. but the camry was transverse OHC or DOHC depending on whch one you had, while the mustang was almost certainly an inline pushrod motor, so again even in your own examples you are comparing apples to oranges.

So, you say that a pump that has no oil in it, and is exposed to air, and air's humidity, will corrode less?

The Car's engines doesn't have pulleys?  It doesn't use oil either?  My God, what have I been doing all these years?  Silly me, putting oil in my engine....  What are these belts attached to then?  It's a perfect example.  And, yet again, you simply don't like it.

You may as well stick you fingers in your ears and go "LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LA LA LA" and call it a debate platform....

You pretend there are no associations betwen topics that are clearly related, and then make entirely pointless suggestions of your own.  What should I be using instead of oil?  Please tell me.  Explain to me how a pump NOT submerged, sitting for a month, is going to suffer less from exposure to the elements, than one under 5 quarts of contaminated oil.  Please, do tell.

None of your suppsoed "points" address the actual principals at hand.  You'd do just as well to ride your lister as you would to keep telling me that Oil is bad for my engine, or that Serpentines are not better for this application, or virtually any other.  Maybe you could use some of those bullet-proof V-Belts as tank treads and mount a barstool to it?  I bet they make better dental floss than a Serpentine.  Oh, you got me...

This isn't a matter of beating someone in an argument.  It's not raising my blood pressure. or really even making me mad...  If Guy wants to give himself headaches, that's all good and well for him.  I would jsut hate to see someone take his advice about not putting oil in your engine to heart...  V-Blet manufacturers love people who use V-Belts....  It gives them 3x the business.  In an emergency or off-grid application, I'd rather have soemthing that I can counton, than soemthing I can replace.  Why not just use some off-the-shelf 3600rpm gas generator then?

Blah blah blah.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4