Puppeteer

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gadget

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
16
General Discussion / Re: Glort gone awol
« on: January 06, 2021, 07:00:45 AM »
I'll give the guy some credit, I was able to use one of his WVO ideas for filtering and drying vacuum pump oil. Has save me lots of $$$

Rest in peace Glorty


17
Engines / Re: Noisy CS 8/1
« on: January 06, 2021, 06:39:46 AM »


I was hoping for an easy fix for you. If the valves where hitting the pistons, you would see marks on top of the pistons. Have you gone over it with a stethoscope yet? I know sound can travel and magnify in bell shapes but I would give it a go if you have one. You might be able to isolate the noise to a location.  I use one daily working on cars all these years. Also, how about posting a video with it running? Maybe someone here can recognize it. Bottom end noises are usually a deeper noise then valve train. Piston pin issues usually have a double clatter type noise. Piston slap and rod bearings can change during load transition but you really cant float/tap the throttle on this motor.

One other thought i had is timing gear backlash. though I think that rock back noise happens at over lap and not before exhaust valve opening. I don't even know if this motor has over lap...I guess its worth a look if you run out of ideas. Might be worth a try to load your flywheels with a 2x4, but is sounds like you've checked them thoroughly. Also, if you feel comfortable with this, try pushing down on the rocker above the push rod and make sure the lifter isn't sticking up a bit and getting slapped by the cam. You could probably actually check it with the motor not running.

Keep up posted on progress,  I'm pretty curious to see what it is.

18
Engines / Re: Noisy CS 8/1
« on: January 06, 2021, 02:23:34 AM »
I had an 85 corolla diesel I was driving across three states a few years back. After coming over a grade I noticed the engine started to knock really loud. I had also fueled up right before the grade. Sounded like the bottom end was coming apart, I wasn't sure if I was going to make it. I thought climbing the hill killed it but it was just bad diesel. Next fill up the noise went away.

Turned out to be bad diesel. Probably had some gasoline mixed in it.

19
General Discussion / Re: Glort gone awol
« on: January 05, 2021, 11:03:35 PM »
I tried that but he is gone, cleared out, disappeared, maybe the CIA got him.  I left him a PM on Microgen, but he hasn't replied or read it.  I too found his knowledge useful and easily overlooked his abrasiveness.  His insight into everything WMO/WVO is unequalled.  If you do happen to go past him, please PM me his details.  I know EdDee is also keen to contact him. Thanks, Peter

He had some really good ideas on drying WVO. I think he had a youtub channel, but I can't find it now. This forum seems to have issues with users disappearing and post vanishing.

20
Engines / Re: Noisy CS 8/1
« on: January 05, 2021, 10:57:36 PM »
Have you tried a separate source for diesel? I would drain the tank and switch out the fuel from another station. You can't fully verify the fuel without some lab testing, just swap it all out and see.

I've gotten bad diesel fuel knock before...

21
gadget,

Sure, you can insulate the head.
Like this guy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2ehdeEJOok

You can also run it slower and add a thermostat to keep the combustion temperatures high.

You can also load the engine up to 85% of the HP it creates at that lower speed, ensuring that it's adequately loaded and making as much heat as possible.

Good luck with the project, and be sure to post pictures/videos

veggie

Wow, that video was just uploaded 2 days ago, talk about timing. Glad to see someone else using insulation, hope to here back how it works. I'm thinking some rockwool with a nice sheet metal cover, it does look pretty hideous like that.

If anyone gets a chance to read the PDFs Hwew posted I recommend it. Lots of good info in there. One thing mentioned is a very lightly loaded diesel could see as high as 500 to 1 air to fuel ratio. This is a big contributor to the stacking or coaking issues. Think about this, lowering the engine RPMs down to match a light load may actually be better in some circumstances vs running at full RPM with a light load. Veggie mentioned it and I agree, matching load to RPM is something to consider. But what about bearing "lugging"? I think in a diesel it would smoke profusely before and "lugging". Anyone have any thoughts on this???? I don't think it would be a problem but thought I would ask anyway.

My motor is still disassembled in boxes at the moment. I started a new business and I don't have much free time. Right now, I'm building a new (larger) freeze dryer for the business and I don't know when I can get back to the motor. I will post pics/results once it gets going. Plus, its about 30F in my garage right now

If I do go the low RPM route, I would do a once a week full RPM / full load exercise combined with some water injection. The higher air volumes can do wonders to push out soot. We had a Mercedes diesel get stuck in full fuel once in a shop and it ran full RPM for about a minute. It left a pile of soot on the shop floor where the exhaust pointed down. The customer reported back no problems with the motor and that it ran better then it had for years. I'm not recommending anyone try this...lol




22
hwew,

I was digging through some of the changfa videos. Thats a nice looking little motor, to bad the ban came in right when they where getting popular. I like the dual balance shafts and gear drive setup. From what I can tell, it is partially splash lube so that would have to be checked out for low RPM operation. I don't think many got imported. There may be less of them in the US then listeroids. Im wondering if someone can import "kits". Im guessing they don't make the R165 anymore, anyone know?


For now, I think I will focus on converting a lister since I'm thinking the Changfa displacement might be to small for very low RPM range. The lister already has the large flywheels....

Lets assume for argument that a 6/1 produces 1 H.P. at 100 RPM (probably less than that). Thats 745 watts of flywheel power. If you apply a 600w load, you are now in the "heavy load" range. Assuming a 33% thermal efficiency lets say we will have 4,100 BTUs/hr waste heat. lets say we want to heat the entire motor minus flywheels from 60F to 180F. heat capacity of mild steel = .122 btu/lb-deg F ...400lbs x 120F increase x .122 = 5,800 BTUish. roughly 85 minutes to full warm up of entire block. Thats assuming no losses from surface radiation on the motor. Thats not allot of heat to work with. If we want to raise 50 gallons of water from 60F to 140F, we need 33,000 BTUs. Thats 8 hours of run time assuming zero loss from the block to the room. Thats almost a perfect match for a little remote cabin and basic hot water needs. FYI this would also involve capturing exhaust heat otherwise numbers are double for water heating time.

The block is going to need to be insulated. Now for what its worth, most vehicles I have worked on hot over the years never see 180F through the entire motor. Mostly between 120-150F on the edges and opposite ends of the motor. We don't have to keep the entire motor at full temp. There is resistance to heat flow, we just need to keep the head and cylinder/piston up to temp.

The other issue is the V.E. We will need to be getting 1.66 CFM into the motor at that RPM. There is a way to confirm this, if someone had a compression gauge and a 2 cylinder lister, they could confirm this with one side running and the other measuring running compression through the RPM band. We could graph VE through the RPM range this way. Other option is to manually spin up a single cylinder lister.

Some thing to think about, the V.E. can't be to horrible at that low of an RPM otherwise these motors would never hand start without glow plugs fully cold. Bumping the compression up may be all that is needed. The induction system may be fine how it is.

This is looking very possible from what I can see.

23
Here is some info: I’ve saved more through the years, I just have to find it.

The Impact of Generator Set Underloading (Must be logged in to view the attachment)


Some other stuff

https://service.multiquip.com/pdfs/Diesel_Engine_Wet_Stacking_Prevention.pdf


https://res.mdpi.com/d_attachment/eng/eng-01-00009/article_deploy/eng-01-00009.pdf

Sorry, this is long winded;

I read both of the PDF's. I know the trucks that idle for hours at truck stops have trouble with wet stacking in cold climates.

This got me thinking about some high temperature wood stoves I have made. I built one last winter with a ceramic fiber burn box and 2 blowers. Out put was very clean. Almost zero carbon build up in the stove. Flue exhaust (2 inch PVC) is basically warm misty CO2. Pretty cool for a wood stove.

I design my wood stoves with these principles; You have your fire triangle - fuel/heat/oxidizer (O2) but I also came up with an efficiency triangle after studying thermal oxidizers - time(under heat)/turbulence/temperature. Burning fuel is pretty simple, break the fuel down to its individual atoms and combine it with and oxidizer and allow enough time. Problem is, there is not enough time in a wood stove so we an make up for it by increasing the heat. In an engine, there is pretty much zero time so its pretty much just heat and mixing(turbulence). You can actually burn a fuel at room temperature by the way. Just allow enough time and it will oxidize(burn).

So in your diesel, as long as you have enough heat, air is coming in, and your injector is spraying fuel, it should run. Problem mentioned in the articles is that there is not enough heat in low load operation and the fuel is not burning completely. Just like if you run your wood stove on low you get build up in the chimeny.

partially broken down fuels(incomplete combustion) produce smaller hydrocarbons like tars/turpins and such and when they condense and combine with carbon it forms a sticky mess. Enough of this can cause engine damage over time.

with diesels unrestricted air intake, the fuel mixture can become extremely lean under light fueling adding to the problem. The cold high volumes of air cools the fuel mix to much causing pockets of unburned fuel.

So basically, motors are designed to operate in a window but, can we move the window around. How low can that window go? They use to run motors at very low RPM years ago, I'm assuming they worked fine???

We just need to maintain the efficiency triangle at the RPM's we want to run at. Listers seem to already have issues with buildup so how do we keep efficiency up? Trap more heat in??? Up the static compression??

I mentioned wrapping the block and head in insulation earlier, Anyone have any thoughts on that????? What issues would this cause??

Great input so far!!

24
Listeroid Engines / Re: Listeroid intake porting
« on: January 03, 2021, 04:08:44 AM »
Shrouding may not be the technically correct term but the 45° seat angle starts at the deck and continues down past the full face of the valve and below it. The head of the valve recessed at .100 below the deck. Certainly not conducive to good flow past the valve,, or great seating either.

Ah yes, I see what you mean. Just curious, what kind of life are you seeing out of the factory seats? Are they prone to sinking?

25
Listeroid Engines / Re: Listeroid intake porting
« on: January 02, 2021, 04:33:47 PM »
When one takes a hard look at these heads there are two restrictions. The 90° turn which cannot be fixed and the way the seats are cut which can be fixed. I was to start working on the heads to increase flows the first thing I would fix is to unshround the valves. The way the seats are cut leaves the valve at the bottom of a deep 45° cut, totally against any notion of high flow past the seat.  When I put hard seats in these heads I move the top of that old seat back a bit and also open up the bottom to match the inserts I use.

I don't remember much valve shrouding on these heads. You got me curious now, I may have to go out and look later.

I really think we need to look closer at a more accurate camshaft and timing. I suspect allot of these clones are making allot less power then rated due to camshaft issues more then anything. Especially on a long rod ratio motor.

26
I've been searching for an option for a low output CHP set, right around .5-1 HP. I'm looking for 300-600watts continues electric and heat output. Think small cabin type setup. I want it to run continues but be able to go a 25k hours between major rebuild(if possible) so I'm thinking low 100-200 RPM. Big piston / flywheel motor looks like the way to go.

So far, I'm thinking a listeroid may be the simplest setup, but I'm not sure what kind of power output at those speeds. I was also looking at a changfa but I think indirect injection would probably be more reliable at low speed vs the changfa direct injection. Its going to also run on oil.

Your looking for only 300 to 600 watts?
A listeroid is too large. It will never heat up enough. There is just too much iron to soaking up the heat. It will coke up, and cylinder will most likely glaze up with such a light load. And a gooey mess coming out of the exhaust. I doubt the crankcase will get hot enough to evaporate the moisture.


You know considering how cool these motors run, it occurred to me maybe they could be insulated. I went to Canada once in January when it was around -18F and my rental car never armed up. The heater barely put out any heat after driving on the high way for about an hour. I'm guessing the cold air around the motor and heater where cooling the motor to much.

What would be the implications of wrapping a listeroid in some insulation? Has anyone tried it yet? I know there are issue with the sump area staying pretty low temp

27
Listeroid Engines / Re: Listeroid intake porting
« on: January 02, 2021, 05:11:43 AM »
In theory at a .9 volumetric efficiency, the 6/1 could produce 9 HP at 650 RPMs. Will never get that high with this type of head though.

But, if you can increase VE by just .1, you should be able to pick up about 1 horse. Maybe thats enough for someone thats need just a little bit more.

It would be really interesting to see how much better an original lister runs vs a clone. I can't imagine the port quality of an original cast head is as bad as these clones.

Maybe I will rig up a used airflow meter (5volt reference type) on my motor when I'm done and see what she's moving (how do I tell if my motor is female?) Now I wish I would of waited to port my head. Maybe I'll find another head to compare. My gen head is rated for 8.3kw so I have a large enough load to max my 8/1 out.

I'm surprised no ones mentioned running a horn ring.........I hope your all having a great new year.

28
I believe they are IDI. Im not sure if they make them in DI. I know the S-195’s were made both ways.

I think the S-165 will be the best you can find for your application.

Confirm, you mean the r165 Changfa correct?

If I ran it at lower RPMs, I would likely need a custom long runner intake and more flywheel mass, should not be a problem


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ATQamebvfU&t=72s

29
I believe they are IDI. Im not sure if they make them in DI. I know the S-195’s were made both ways.

I think the S-165 will be the best you can find for your application.

Confirm, you mean the r165 Changfa correct?

If I ran it at lower RPMs, I would likely need a custom long runner intake and more flywheel mass, should not be a problem

30
Listeroid Engines / Re: Listeroid intake porting
« on: January 01, 2021, 01:33:09 AM »

I may actually pick up a 16/2 down the road and use the 8/1 with the axial charger.

I would love an axial charger on the crankshaft of my 6/1.
If you find a good source that does not require a second mortgage to purchase, let me know.

Here's a fellow that built one for his Listeroid. Nice compact unit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyJYdHzwsy4

How about a radial instead of axial? There was a guy on a youtube video that was putting magnets on the pulley faces of the flywheels and pulling some power directly off the flywheels. Its like a built in rotor. I wish I could find the vidoe. Its allot of magnets but they could be spaced. You wouldn't have to surround the entire flywheel with coils, just as many as you want for power.

Why not make your own?  The windmill guys have lots of good right ups. You could also go the scrap route.  I think the hover board motors are good for 600w's. I think the washing machine direct drive motors are pretty high output but i don't remember what volts they are wound for.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7