Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Halfnuts

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17]
241
Listeroid Engines / Re: The big shake out
« on: March 06, 2006, 04:29:17 PM »
Well, not to get too specific, but I was talking about a certain website that was gone and then came back.  Here's an example.

Ok, let's say you're looking at buying a new car.  You look at their website and see the following: 

Dealer One:  "Don't buy from Dealer A, B, or C because all the cars they sell are trash.  Those dealers sell trash to idiots and they are all a bunch of liars, too."

Dealer Two:  "If you buy from me, I will make sure that you are a satisfied customer.  I keep the following parts in stock (list) and can guarantee delivery within 10 days of your order."

So which dealer would you rather buy from?

That was all I was trying to convey. 

242
Listeroid Engines / Re: The big shake out
« on: March 06, 2006, 05:24:22 AM »
Funny, though, how prior to his e-mail problems 75% of his (OSL's) last shipment was full of sand and would have to be replaced, posing "dire consequences for our company."  And prior to that a few 12/2s were found to contain parts of the mold in their crankcases, and before that a couple of other engines were full of rust and appeared to have been assembled from used components.  Fair enough as far as full disclosure goes.  Now, somehow only the engines HE sells are the good ones.   And of course the earlier announcements have somehow been deleted.  I smell BS.  I wish sellers would just tell you what they're offering, rather than slamming their competition's products. 

243
Listeroid Engines / Re: LUBRICATION RELATED
« on: March 05, 2006, 04:02:25 AM »
What is it RedGreen says?  "If it doesn't break, you weren't trying!"

Is there enough light in there to see where the oil is going?

Halfnuts

244
Listeroid Engines / Re: 12/2 firing on One
« on: March 01, 2006, 04:17:26 AM »
Cranelift, you know, if you fire a fine spray of diesel into the air like that and let some of it settle on you, you'll smell so nice I bet the chicks won't be able to keep their hands off you!  A manly fragrance.  What do we call it? 

245
Listeroid Engines / Re: Changeover compression valve
« on: March 01, 2006, 04:10:24 AM »
Same thing with a coule motorhomes we had.  Old one had a 275 HP Ford V-10 engine.  Motorhome weighed 14000 lbs all up.  New one has a 275 HP Cummins ISB and weighs 24000 lbs.  Max torque is at 1900 rpm.  Guess which one I'd rather drive up a hill.  The Cummins will out pull the V-10 any day.  They have the same theoretical power, but in order to achieve that power you have to rev the V-10 to a speed that no engine should have to run for any length of time.  Going up hills I felt like I was whipping a puppy.  Just didn't have the heart to do it, so would pull over and take it easy in the slow lane and let the diesel pickkups hauling their long 5th wheel rigs run past me probably 20 mph faster.  The flatter torque curve of the diesel makes it far better for pulling a load than an equivalent horsepower gas engine that only achieves that power at an unsustainable speed.  So I understand what Guy means.  I just think the terminology he uses is inexact, and that's where the frustration comes in.



246
Listeroid Engines / Re: Changeover compression valve
« on: March 01, 2006, 02:24:27 AM »
Trying to find some room for agreement here.  I think this is at least partly a semantic argument. 

I just noticed something in an earlier post.  Guy said:

"put any vehicle you like on a perfectly flat straight road, in as low revs as it will pull in top gear.
pedal to the metal
1. peak bhp will be top speed (assuming gearing etc)
2. peak torque will be maximum acceleration
3. peak torque is the maximum incline you'll pull without having to change down"

Point 1:  Agreed.  Torque doesn't increase linearly with RPM, especially in a gas engine.  Diesel torque is more constant with changes of RPM than gas engines, i.e. the diesel engine has a flatter torque/rpm curve.
Point 2:  Agreed. 
Point 3:  Agreed.

What he's done here is to construct a torque vs. speed comparison using a practical illustration. 




247
Listeroid Engines / Re: Changeover compression valve
« on: February 28, 2006, 11:21:11 PM »
Guy,

I think there's been some talking at cross purposes.  Most of us on the board probably learned torque/horsepower from a textbook in high school and college physics classes, not from getting grease under our fingernails.  I did that, by the way, but that was after school.

Torque is a force applied at some distance from a point.  No movement involved, no time factor.  It's just twisting an unmoving object.  Take a wrench and twist on a bolt head and you're applying torque to that bolt head.  Once the bolt breaks loose and begins to turn, you can talk about power, because that's torque per unit of time.  It's harder to twist really fast than it is to twist slow because it takes more power to do so. 

All a transmission does is to take the power from an engine and turn the output shaft slowly with a lot of torque, or quickly with less torque.  It trades torque for speed.  The total amount of power is the same in each case because  Horsepower = (torque * RPM)/5252 

You can take a motor and gear it way down and have a whole lot of torque available like on a winch.  Or you can take that same motor and gear it up and have a lot of speed like on a circular saw, but little torque.  The total amount of power is the same in each case.  And I think intuitively that's what you've been trying to say using different examples.

Halfnuts

248
Listeroid Engines / Re: Changeover compression valve
« on: February 28, 2006, 07:48:35 PM »
The heat generated by combustion of the fuel raises increases the volume of the exhaust gas _in addition to_ the stoichiometric increase caused by combustion ("n" in the formula below) that Guy mentioned. 

PV=nRT 

P= Pressure
V= Volume
n= number of moles of gas
R= Universal gas constant
T= Temperature

I'm new here but I've been reading the mail for a few months.  I think a lot of what has been stated about the Lister being inefficient and not generating a "real" 6 HP is based on assumptions made by those experienced only with modern high RPM petrol powered engines which are designed and rated very differently from what was done 75 years ago.  The principles of engine design were well known even then.  The low specific fuel consumption of the Lister engine screams to all who have ears that this engine is pretty well optimised. 


249
Listeroid Engines / Re: 12/2 firing on One
« on: February 28, 2006, 07:20:56 PM »
Firing a few times and then not at all sounds for all the world like air bubbles.  But you swapped the injectors and the SAME cylinder won't light?  If you don't have an air bubble in the pump or injector, then maybe that side of the pump is not building proper pressure.  Try pulling that injector, hook it up to the fuel line, bleed it, and start the engine with the injector spitting into a can.  See if it continues to do so.  If it does, then it's not the pump and it's not an air bubble.  About all that's left is timing and compression, but you say both are OK . . .


250
Original Lister Cs Engines / Re: Which oil? (uk based)
« on: February 28, 2006, 05:04:08 PM »
Guy, there's no reason to go ballistic every time someone disagrees with you.  You've been wrong before, just like the rest of us. 

I used to sell oil in the parts store during college.  Valvoline had a line of non-detergent oils then for engine break-in and for old car buffs (not that the buffs were old, the cars were).  We sold 20W and 30W in a blue and white can that had "NON-DETERGENT" written in large friendly blue letters.  All the other oils, even back then in the 1970s, were detergent oils.  You had to specify non-detergent oil if you wanted it.  Perhaps oils in the UK were/are different.

I do know for a fact, though, that the level of detergent in lube oils meant for diesel use are much higher than that for petrol engines.  So much so, that the manufacturers rep. cautioned us to make sure customers didn't use the diesel lube oil in gas engines because the added detergent sometimes caused piston rings in older gas engines to leak, causing increased oil consumption.

Halfnuts

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17]