Puppeteer

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - snail

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15
196
Original Lister Cs Engines / Re: Aircooled VA version
« on: July 11, 2006, 12:30:39 AM »
Yep, I was right in my original assertion... pig ugly! :D

http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel/Technical/Startomatic1.htm

197
Original Lister Cs Engines / Aircooled VA version
« on: July 06, 2006, 11:39:43 AM »
       Came across some info(dated 1976) on the air cooled version of the 8/1, otherwise known as the VA.It appears to share most of the dimensions of it's watercooled brother except for the obvious.Has anyone got any photo's of these monsters? I'd imagine it's a noisy and ugly brute but it's listed as using 10% less fuel and 30% less lube oil than the kettle version.I assume it's pulling a big fan which makes the fuel efficiency  even more surprising. Presumably everything runs a bit hotter without the water, which must help.Did this cause any other problems? I'd guess that they weren't too popular judging by the current scarcity.Do our Indian brethren make them?
      Don't worry,I'm not going to glue fins on mine ;) , just interested.

Cheers

Brian

198
Original Lister Cs Engines / Re: British Standard O rings?
« on: June 30, 2006, 03:37:05 AM »
What makes you think this would be easy? :D I'm an english rubber technologist and this system still drives me mad.
Try:

http://www.afmusa.com/doc_generator.asp?doc_id=3731

And best of Britsh luck!  :D

Cheers

Brian

199
Hi all,
      Has anyone ever heard of an indian manufacturer who monitors this site? I can't believe that none of 'em know we're here. Maybe one will join up if we promise not to bite!

Cheers,

Snail (another ex B44 owner!)

200
General Discussion / Re: A Newbie with a Lister A
« on: June 02, 2006, 06:59:51 AM »
Hi,
   Sorry this reply took so long, you've probably worked all of this out by now, but here goes anyway!
By the sound of it , you've got one of the non detachable cylinder head versions, same as mine. I assume that the core plug is part of the casting process because i can see no other use for it.The easiest way to decoke the head is to remove the big end bolts and remove the barrel/head/piston all in one go.Careful, it weighs twice as much as you'd think! :D. With the piston out, the easiest way to remove the carbon is probably to send it for a dip in the hot tank at yourlocal engine shop.I used the oldtimer's trick of heating up a patch of the offending carbon with the oxy torch until it's bright red, then turn off the acetylene and blow straight oxygen at it. Works best if the whole casting is warmed up to maybe 100 deg C first. Don't try this inside cos the smoke is like a blacksmiths forge being lit! ;D
I have a book from the 30's which says that you can do the above in situ by removing the valve caps after the engine has been run up to temperature. I wasn't game to try it!

Keep up the good work!

Brian

201
General Discussion / Re: Lister J
« on: May 23, 2006, 04:01:46 AM »
Guy,
      Last time I was there  the brewery was owned by COORS (damned yanks,OOPS sorry guys! ;) Prior to that they were making XXXX . I'd imagine Burton bitter has gone the way of most things, Listers included. I was a Marston's drinker myself,
     God , I'd kill for a decent pint right now!

Cheers,

Brian the Snail

202
General Discussion / Re: Lister J
« on: May 23, 2006, 01:22:33 AM »
Guy,
     Have you been approached for the "Grumpy Old Men" series on the TV? ;D
 Incidentally, I know what you mean about the anal sorts. Wonder what they'll say to my nickel plated carb and electronic ignition? They'll never see it though, cos this is destined to be a working engine.
    Incidentally, this attitude must be something to do with the pommie blood - I spent the first 20 years of my life in sunny Burton on Trent and still can't shake the B***** accent!

Cheers,

Brian

203
General Discussion / Re: Lister J
« on: May 22, 2006, 06:01:57 AM »
Hi BK,
      you may get lynched for talking about petrol motors on this site! I have an L series motor sitting near my indian listeroid and the resemblance is scary.The L was built around 1924. The answer you're looking for may well be "Mid brunswick green" or"mid hunter green". No doubt I'll be corrected on this and I'll be happy to accept correction (especially as I can't remember my source). The problem I encountered is that those names mean different things to different people. I ended up powder coating mine and was forced to choose the nearest available from a limited range.Best bet is to try to match part of the old paint (Under one of those brass plates is good) at the local paint shop.

Cheers,

Brian

204
Listeroid Engines / Re: Real Compression Ratio
« on: May 11, 2006, 04:35:32 AM »
Gerry H,
          I'm sure you're right about the round corners in the chamber,I just couldn't think of an easy way to do it(I've never seen an Indian plug).Dead spots have to be a bad thing.I've often wondered what goes on in a c/o valve engine as there is only a small hole to allow air into and out of the low pressure cavity during normal running. Must be heaps of turbulence in there, which must be a good thing.
         The valve pockets were different between the heads on my twin.I can't remember the detail, but I wrote down 5cc's per head which must have been the average.Percentage wise, this is a lot less than the 7cc Kevin got.
         I'm not at all confident that these engines are consistent within one factory, let alone between factories. Somewhere in these hallowed pages there is a reference to removing the crank handle before disengaging the valve lifter when starting.I would have no chance of that, and in fact need to give a pretty good heave to get over compression even cranking at max speed.My wife is unable to start the monster even though she can get the cranking revs.
        Incidentally, how many wives/partners get involved ? Maybe we should start a thread for "Lister widows" to air their grievances? Thinking about it, that's probably not such a good idea! ;)
"listerwives.com" would probably attract a few of the wrong sort of people....don't even THINK about reader's wives..... ;D


Cheers,

Brian

205
Listeroid Engines / Re: Real Compression Ratio
« on: May 10, 2006, 05:55:28 AM »
Hi Kevin,
          I have a 12/2 Powerline with C/O valves installed.I burn used ATF and was getting a slight haze in the exhaust so cc'd my heads (as mentioned in a previous post). I ended up with 14.9:1 (valves out) and 16.9 :1 (valves in). Since the 16.9 is lower than either the powerline(18:1) or Lister (17.5:1)  specification,I now just run it with the valves "in" all the time. Result : better combustion, no smoke, less fear of heart attack when operating C/O valve ;). Have you ever used one of those fire breathing monsters?
        I'd be inclined to modify your plug as you suggested, then reduce your head clearance until you arrive at a CR which is comfortable to you( a compromise between the ideal CR and piston belting things.)I doubt that you'll upset combustion in the prechamber, and if you aren't happy, you can always change back.
       Incidentally, although my motor has smaller bores, the prechamber volume (valves in) measured 72cc too.
       As an aside, a friend of mine who is a professional engine builder suggested I measure the actual stroke in both cylinders. I reckon there was .002"  difference, which I put down to my measurement technique. He said that many cranks have measurable differences between cylinders and therefore different CR's. Probably more of an issue in Pro Stock than Listers! Even though yours is a single, it would be nice to know that the bloke on the crank grinder was up to the job!

Cheers,

Brian

206
A few extra gems I've learned the hard way!

Automotive alternators appear to be very inefficient for a home power setup.I hooked up a 35A(24v) alternator to a spare 5hp honda motor to charge my batteries with less noise than the 5 Kva unit.It had the standard A section v belt (PLEASE, nobody mention serpentine...!) which probably didn't help, but when putting out its rated 840W the Honda was pulling for all it was worth.840w is just over 1HP in theoretical terms but I was putting in (say) 4HP. The advantage came when the batteries charged up a bit as I could drop the motor revs to around 1500 but still put in a tolerable 10-15A.This was much quieter and was what I was hoping for in the first place.

Copper water pipe makes a good bus bar/cable if you have to run large currents for any distance.The local plumbing supplier had a special on annealed 1/2''at just the time i was installing the afore mentioned alternator.2 x 25m rolls slid into (separate!) 3/4" poly pipes made for some very useful underground cables. This would normally have been very expensive but at this time it worked out cheaper than cables and with less(!) voltage drop.

"Modified square wave" inverters are tolerable with most TV's, Computers and Fridges. Someone mentioned harmonics in an earlier post. I'm not sure whether my TV has a switchmode power supply but it coped OK. You could definitely see the harmonics as a pattern on the screen though, which disappeared when the genny was started.(Couldn't hear  the b****y TV then though! :D) The computer (switchmode) also coped OK, fridge compressor ran noisily , but otherwise OK. Automatic washing m/c's have a habit of self destructing on square wave, as do pedestal fans (the cheaper ones sometimes lasted a whole hour!) Any induction motor has problems , some more than others.
Brushed motors work fine.

Around here, "modified square wave" inverters are pretty cheap second hand as most people are shelling out the extra for sine wave. I'd part with my old ones (350w and 1500w) for $100 each. I think the freight might be a problem though ;)

Cheers,

Brian

207
I've been off- grid for 15 years  with mainly solar power in 3 different stages :

First set up was 160W of solar for lights, tv etc.Gas fridge and 5kVA honda Genny for washing m/c, vaccuum etc.This set up was Ok for a minimalist approach but gas fridges are expensive to run and the Honda is noisy and thirsty.

Second arrangement was 480w of panels, 24v DC fridge and lighting, Larger loads AC. Quite easy to live with,occasional use of honda, mainly in overcast weather.The house was wired for both AC and DC whilst I was building it.I wouldn't bother with the DC part again, mainly due to the unreliability of  the 24v fluoro's which were available.(I've since overcome this problem with the simplest of modifications.Why couldn't the manufacturers do it?)

The current :D incarnation has 1980w of panels,1900 AH of batteries, AC fridge(still using the DC one too) and the 12/2 when we want air conditioning. Most of the year, we rely totally on solar (sorry guys!) with the lister as a back up. (incidentally, the side valve honda is still going strong!) The AC fridge is much easier to live with than gas or DC.All of my (3)inverters have been trouble free, only being changed when I wanted a larger unit. The latest sine wave unit is the best so far .No problems with induction motors, efficiency is not a major issue and the standby current draw is hardly measurable.
Battery replacement is the big issue. We have two battery banks, a 500 AH set powering DC only and a 1300 AH set feeding the inverter only. This is only because of the gradual development process. Total replacement cost is in the order of AU$ 10 000.This is in effect our electricity bill. Battery life is estimated at 10 - 15 years so the bill comes to $700-1000 per year.There still ain't any way of getting a free lunch.
Despite the cost, I would still use a big battery bank and inverter if I were to build a new system based around a Lister alone.Combining it with a small hydro (yep even 200w),wind or solar has to be an improvement though.

Cheers,

Brian

208
Listeroid Engines / Re: SPEED CONTROL
« on: April 12, 2006, 01:19:54 AM »
G'Day all,
          At 3am this morning I was lying awake thinking about lister governors.How sad is that? No wonder my wife just shakes her head and walks away... ;)
          Allow me to pontificate. This may not be correct and I'm certainly open to correction but there must be something in this.
         Imagine a lister with big holes around the governer weights.With the spring removed, reach into the (Stationary ;D) motor and move the governor weights outward to simulate increasing speed . What happens (Obviously ::) is that the injector rack moves "in" to reduce the fuel. As there appears to be a sweet spot in the movement of the weights, this must correspond to a given rack position.We are fortunate(?) on our engines that we have miles of external linkage to play with. Would it be possible to vary the length of the linkage so that the weights are in their optimum position for the usual load.The spring would then be modified/adjusted to give the correct RPM.
        My thoughts(guesses ;) on this were sparked by the fact that the Lister L(petrol) version was rated at anywhere between 450 and 650 RPM without changing the governor weights.I don't know if any of this is of any practical use but it's just my 2c worth(and of course we all know that 2c Australian is worth less than 2c US! ;)

Cheers,

Brian

209
Listeroid Engines / Re: increasing power, tuned intake and exhaust ?
« on: April 07, 2006, 12:15:33 AM »
Good point, maybe a 44 gallon ( 55 to you) drum would be enough .I've got plenty of those around. I assume the length of the intake that we're after would be from  the drum to the inlet valve . The meter would be upstream of the drum .I dont think the drum would cause any odd reflected pressure waves would it?

Cheers,

Brian

210
Listeroid Engines / Re: increasing power, tuned intake and exhaust ?
« on: April 05, 2006, 08:13:53 AM »
Bob g
       our equivalent to radio shack is selling an air speed meter for around $70 Australian (US $50?) If it looks OK and has the right range I'll buy one and lash it to some sort of telescopic inlet tube. Should prove interesting if nothing else.As if I don't have enough to do at weekends!

Cheers,

Brian

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15