Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Procrustes

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22
31
Generators / Re: Zhejiang ST head?
« on: November 16, 2006, 09:26:52 PM »
I ordered a set of bearings for my very used generac belt-drive genhead last night, with spares.  Total cost: $25 for two sets.

That sounds like good advice.  Where did you get the bearings?

32
Listeroid Engines / Re: 12/2 vs 1/14
« on: November 16, 2006, 05:28:37 PM »
12/2 produces cleaner power, with an impulse every other stroke as opposed to one impulse in four strokes with the one-banger.

The Lister 12/2 and CE etc all produce 2 power pulses followed by two exhaust strokes, making the engine sound 'lopsided' when starting up. The cranks are at 180 degrees to each other. I don't know if the Indian engines have the same arrangement.

Picture of a new 12/2 Lister crank at:

http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel/Ebay/ListerCrank.jpg

Peter


Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding.

33
Generators / Re: Zhejiang ST head?
« on: November 16, 2006, 05:18:44 PM »
I picked mine up yesterday actually.  It's 30kW, 2 3/8" keyed shaft.  The fit and finish is lacking, but for the price that is what I would expect.  No plastic.  560 pounds.  It will be awhile yet before I determine whether it works well or not.  I haven't looked at the bearings yet.  Also I've never seen another ST head, so I'm unqualified to pass judgment.

34
Listeroid Engines / Re: LIster Engine EPA Regs
« on: November 16, 2006, 06:17:51 AM »
The EPA will seem like a little girl when you feel the power of the Crimson Tide.

But I jest.  Never cared much about the Iron Bowl or football in general.

While at an Alabama high school party the prettiest girl in my class approached me and said, "Alabama or Auburn?"  I desperately wanted to get the correct answer but, typically, I did not.  She poured beer on my head and walked off.

35
General Discussion / Re: seeking an answer...
« on: November 16, 2006, 04:47:20 AM »
Bob, when I want to be I can be a FUCKING good engineer, but I fall so far short of even lesser gods like henry ricardo and james watt and otto diesel and a string of other names whose boots I am not fit to lick it ain't even funny, and THEY worshipped people like newton and cavendish and maxwell etc.

Rudolf Diesel, not Otto, as I'm sure you know.

36
Listeroid Engines / Re: 12/2 vs 1/14
« on: November 16, 2006, 04:37:42 AM »
Procrustes, shame on you.  It's my recollection that the 225/6 had sparkplugs :P

I know, I know.  A few years back the utility ran gas along my road, not even sure why as the road doesn't lead anywhere and not many folks live out here.  But it's hard to go to the trouble of stockpiling diesel when I have an unlimited supply of fuel.

I still use the 6/1 to lure the ladies into my home of course.  As has been stated here before, it's a chick magnet.

37
Listeroid Engines / Re: 12/2 vs 1/14
« on: November 16, 2006, 02:28:51 AM »
I hope that either route will be better and cheaper than a "big box" genset...

Yet another route is to build a generator with an automotive engine.  If you have natural gas or a propane tank this could be ideal.  With all new or remanufactured parts you can build a 30kW genny for $3,000 or so.

Mine is a slant six running at 1800 RPM for about 65hp, directly coupled to a 30kW ST head.    Winco charges $15,000 for something similar, albeit with a much fancier head.  This gen is oversized so that I can eliminate my electric subpanel and still not worry about ruining a pump or worrying about when the refrigerator turns on or whatever.  It is a lot of work though.  Here's a parts list:

   Impco CA55-500 mixer (natural gas/LP carb)
   Woodward/Dyna PF31 actuator/throttle body
   Chrysler 225ci slant six engine
   Dyna DPG-2103 (?) governor
   Guardian Couplings "FH" style coupling (bolts to flywheel)
   I-beams
   Cement
   Siding to match your house
   Radiator, muffler, belts, hoses, etc

I love the Listeroid, but as a practical matter I don't want to store the fuel  I've become the widely ridiculed Gentleman Collector.  Well, minus the gentleman part that is.

38
Listeroid Engines / Re: 12/2 vs 1/14
« on: November 15, 2006, 11:10:12 PM »
Here's everything I can think of.  I addressed some things you say you're familiar with on the supposition that too much information is better than too little.

12/2 produces cleaner power, with an impulse every other stroke as opposed to one impulse in four strokes with the one-banger.

The 14/1 is sometimes (usually? always?) DI, as opposed to the more common IDI, as you noted.

If you want to burn vegetable or motor oil, the consensus seems to be that IDI is better, though there is anecdotal evidence of the GM-90 series of DI Listeroids doing well on such heavy oils.

You might study the price of two 6/1's in place of a 12/2.  When I was doing research it seemed I could get the dual 6/1's for almost the same price, which is a better deal in a couple of ways: you're more likely to have some power, and you have some capacity to run low and high loads by driving a single gen head with one or two engines.  There are some gearing and clutching issues to be resolved in this scenario.

You seem to be aware the the 14/1 DI is more economical in terms of fuel.  Some object to the differing expansion characteristics of aluminum pistons and iron blocks and the increased need for lubrication on the alloy piston for cooling and I've also heard tell of an enhanced capacity for the alloy piston to seize.

DI is generally louder isn't it?

The 14 typically runs at a higher RPM, and engine wear occurs as the square of RPM.  It will also be noisier than a 650 RPM machine.  George at utterpower.com opines that the 650 RPM machines have a more relaxing sound than the higher RPM Listeroids, but I wouldn't know as I've never heard the higher RPM ones.

Ashwamegh 12/2's have, or used to have, a proclivity to break idler gears.

12/2's do not always lubricate as well as 6/1's, so you might favor one with an oil pump over the conventional splash lubrication.

Spare part convenience is paramount IMO.  The 14/1 has a non-standard bore/stroke, right?  Some 12/2 parts are different from 6/1's.  The standard IDI 6/1 is going to be the easiest to get parts for.

39
General Discussion / Re: seeking an answer...
« on: November 15, 2006, 08:07:18 PM »
There has been mention of the great personalities of science and engineering.  What made these people great is not raw intelligence or the willingness to look at things differently then what is commonly known, both are fairly common by themselves, but the combination is not, also need a good deal of luck.

I don't disagree with what you say here, but I'd put persistence and dedication higher on the list.  Newton had an extraordinary capacity to concentrate.  Einstein made several comments to the effect that others could equal his accomplishments if they matched his dedicated.  Mozart is the archetypal prodigy, but what is lesser known is that his father pushed him very hard from early on.  By the time he wrote "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" at age four he had something like 1500 hours of piano practice under his belt (also his father is the one who actually wrote down the composition...).  Edison said genius is 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration.  Steve Wozniak could work for four days straight without sleep.  I don't deny that luck, intelligence and perspective are factors, but persistence always accompanies genius, and geniuses regularly cite it as their edge.

40
General Discussion / Re: seeking an answer...
« on: November 15, 2006, 03:41:55 AM »
interestingly i can find formulae for every facet of an engine, from volumetric efficiency to mach index's, from cylinder pressures to flame propagation and ignition timeing, connecting rod ratio's to chamber design, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc harmonics to resilient mounts, literally every part and parcel of an engine can and has been analized and expressed in some form of formulae, .... save one!

I'm not addressing your main argument one way or the other Bob, but I don't think this particular part is true.  If it were, there would be no need to experiment with engines as one could predict the results of a given change.

41
Listeroid Engines / Re: Idler gear failures
« on: November 12, 2006, 10:20:09 PM »
SIGH...PROCRUSTES,  you just sadden me by the way you post, and then hide behind your hands (mouth?)

1)You said "I was only informing ListerDiesel". No, you were not; you said "Utterpower.com is behind the bronze idler." THAT is a lie. utterpower was not, and is not behind the bronze idlers. And you were told so. So you were NOT informing ListerDiesel, you were pumping them full of your brand of sh**.

George popularized the bronze idler, and I believe he's the only dealer who has sold them to the public.  That is justification to say he's behind them.  If you want to tell me that someone else introduced it, fine, I don't pretend to know.  Wrangling about "who's behind it" is splitting hairs, I don't even care.  You dragged me into this.

2)If I was attacking you, you would know it.

You're attacking me all right, in your next breath you call me a liar and compare me to a dog.

You constantly post half-truths, innuendos, and outright bs.  Most on this forum are kind souls, and don't even attempt to correct you. But is it kinder to let the dog snarl and worry at people's pant legs who are walking down the sidewalk, until one day someone has enough of it and shoots the dog, or is it kinder to correct the dog as needed, so he no longer snarls, etc?

Calling me a constant liar without providing any evidence is irresponsible.

3)Insofar as posting in caps goes; am so sorry for you. Have posted how it is with the idlers several times, and if you ever took the time to read and understand it, you would not keep re-posting the garbage you do.  So I encourage with caps. If you don't like that, TOO BAD.

I read through every post by 'fuddyduddy' mentioning 'idler' and you don't say a word about "who's behind" bronze idlers.  In fact you quoted utterpower.com, same as me.

Thanks for not yelling so much.

4) A recent post said "But I say the problem lies in the location in the idler bolt hole (or the location of the cam shaft)......Not the material used for the gear".

Now xyzer is a really decent sort of person, you can tell it by his posts. However, he did not need to say that at all, because no one else to my knowledge HAS RECENTLY SAID THAT IT IS THE GEAR MATERIAL THAT CAUSES THE PROBLEM.

Indeed, JohnF said  "I think the main problem is that the hole for the idler gear is slightly off in some engines, causing backlash problems.  No aftermarket idler is going to solve that and a hardened one is merely going to ensure that other parts that are much more difficult to fix, break."

And indeed,  about that I posted "Thank you John, perfectly written, and absolutely true."

The truth is, The Indian Listeroids have cases whose crankshafts are not placed where they should be, their cams are not located where they should be, and their idler pinions are located wrong.  Now GIVEN PART, OR SOME, OR ALL OF THOSE PROBLEMS MAY BE FOUND IN ANY ENGINE, AND THE INDIANS ARE NOT WILLING TO CORRECT IT, HOW DO YOU PROPOSE WE SOLVE THE PROBLEM IF IT IS PRESENT?

SORRY, the only fix that will work reasonably well for a reasonable price that I know of is the bronze idler.

 A grade 25 CI cam gear, and grade 25 CI idler pinion, combined with the steel crank gear that all Listeroids use, to the best of my knowledge, INSURE a really bad "train wreck" when the engine centers are not within 3-7 thousandths of correct.

Grade 5 idlers and cam gears, such as Prakash, Ashwamegh, and others use, are so soft that they will erode rapidly , and have a very low life expectancy at best, EVEN IF THE ENGINE CENTERS ARE proper. Now please tell me what other solutions you propose??

Someone please tell me a simple, inexpensive solution.

I didn't say a word about this!  How do you figure you are you refuting me?

Since you've gotten personal: behind your insults, attacks, and bluster is the blind rage of a halfwit.  You don't command enough respect for your insults to be significant.

42
Listeroid Engines / Re: Idler gear failures
« on: November 12, 2006, 05:55:47 PM »
PROCRUSTES, UTTERPOWER IS NOT "BEHIND" THE BRONZE IDLERS,  GEORGE HAS ONLY REPORTED ON THEM.  AND, he was part of the solution, not part of the problem. Why don't you report something factually for once, instead of BS?

Is it not true that utterpower introduced the bronze idler for the Listeroid and is the only place selling it?  I was merely informing ListerDiesel.  I didn't say George part of the problem.  I quoted his rationale.  Why are you attacking me for this?  Instead why not explain how I'm wrong.

Seriously, can you please knock off the outraged, yelling thing?  I've asked you this nicely before.  Kindergarten teachers tell children to find words to express themselves rather than yelling.  Did no one teach you that?  Do you enjoy conversing with people who constantly yell?

43
Listeroid Engines / Re: Idler gear failures
« on: November 12, 2006, 08:05:04 AM »
Bronze would seem to be a strange choice for a gear, unless it is 'gunmetal' which is slightly different in composition. There are slight benefits in casting and machining, but for a straight-cut gear the tooth loadings would preclude a relatively soft metal. The only bronze straight-cut gears I can recall are the safety gears on my lathe which are there to protect the gear train if you have a jamming of the saddle when screwcutting etc.

I would have thought that the material costs alone would have mitigated against bronze/brass/gunmetal.

Utterpower.com is behind the bronze idler.  Here's their rationale:

"If we are looking for an idea situation, the gears should be made of dissimilar materials, and there is probably no better material than bronze gear material for that idler. As you might imagine, this material is not cheap, but changing out that junk cast gear before it causes a train wreck and takes all the teeth off your cam gear is a good thing! Many rail road engines use bronze gears because they wear in to the other gears and then work harden to live a long life, RRs use this material for this reason."

This is taken from http://utterpower.com/listeroid_timing_gears.htm

44
Listeroid Engines / Quality in an Ashwamegh twin
« on: November 12, 2006, 07:54:12 AM »
This is the engine they should be selling in the US market.




While you're poking around there check out the flywheel battery: http://live.pege.org/2006-hannover/flywheel-storage.htm

45
Generators / Re: Transfer switch rant
« on: November 10, 2006, 07:17:17 AM »
Would you please tell my wife  " Buickanddeere was right"

I could win a Nobel prize in the morning, and by the afternoon my wife would have found fault in the way I parked the car, or the flavor of ice cream I brought home, or etc etc.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22