12
« on: May 13, 2007, 07:11:16 PM »
Folks:
This is in response to an E-mail I got 2 days ago with a ctitique of some things I wrote earlier, and this gives me a chance to answer this as well as provide some thoughts as they pertain to this thread.
I've got a L/N 24 volt alternator spec'd for a Kenworth wrecker. New, never installed, bought freight salvage. This unit weighs almost 25 pounds. The interesting thing to me is that it is intended to use an external regulator, thus has none internally.
This makes it ideal for "our" purposes. I'm setting up the 3 cylinder Deutz 2011 I got recently, with a 15KW ST head driven by a shaft from a stubshaft to flywheel adapter by Hayes Mfg. aided by a short telescoping shaft. This allows room on the genny shaft end for a pulley (sheave) of 6 to 8 inches diameter. At 1800 RPM for 60CPS, I want to drive the L/N at no more that 4000 RPM to extend the life of the bearings, and cut down on the losses from belts ETC.
The part that holds my interest here is the chart published by Prestolite giving output VS rotor speed. Within the spec sheet for this unit we laso note that the Maximum, Never Exceed, Redline, Blue Limit, "Cap'n, She's Gonna Blow," Kaboom into small pieces speed is 8000. (OK, so I'm dramatic and a Star Trek Fan.)
The point of all this is, Whenever you can, take pains to read and understand the specs of the parts you are using. Automobile alternators are the greatest things invented, BUT they were intended for use in cars where most of the time they were at or near engine idle speed. You know, Police cars. They, along with Taxis drove the developement of these things. Truck engines, on the other hand run more slowly, spend less time proportionately at idle and are heavier duty all around. They are also, with the better quatiry units such as those intended for emergency vehicle use, more frequently equiped with external regulators, externally mounted diode packs, (rectifiers) and are usually rated for a higher duty cycle and speeds nearer those WE USE.
Now, for most of us, weight isn't an issue. Well, for our engines anyway. (A full race aluminum Listeroid with a magnesium ST15 head? Never happen.) I'll be using the heavier, easier to work with, probably older and in my opinion, more adaptable technologies. This doesen't mean I'll be ignoring the latest tech when it comes around, but I'll look carefully at it and what it replaces before changing things.
In closing this rant, I spent most of last week with my friend Michaels family, clelbrating his 80th birthday, and GENTLY pumping him for every scrap of info about balance I could. He is an 80 year old, opinionated broken eglish speaking Cuban, who knows more about engine machining than any 15 people I can name, and I learned a lot. Look for a lengthy post or series of posts in the next few days.
Best to All and "Please give my love to your Mother." (Quote: Kevin Kitchens, local radio celeb, deceased.) Wayne.