He's Baaaaaaaackkkkkk.
Same old bad guys. Archie Bunker; eat your heart out.
Something new?
No. Nothing new I don't think
Down here in our small island at the bottom of the world, the politics of water are different to, say, the US
We have enormous volumes of the stuff and it falls from the sky and streams down the rivers and flows out to sea. In about 90% of New Zealand there's enough rainfall that a pair of 25,000 litre tanks in the backyard, simply catching the rainwater that falls onto the roof of the house, will provide more than enough water for the average family
If you do dumb shit like insisting on washing your car or watering your lawn in the middle of summer you may need a backup supply in some areas . . .
Where it goes wrong is when users are concentrated such as, say, in fertile areas where dairy farming has intensified and everyone wants to take water from the same river or aquifer. Often only some tens of kilometres away there will be a river flowing thousands of cubic metres a second out to sea - not exactly "wasted" but maybe under-used
The challenge for Regional Councils etc is to balance the needs of the environment with the needs of industry and the wishes of ratepayers, citizens and lobby groups
Not to defend our Australian Archie Bunker, but I have on occasions been lectured by you, ardent, green people about the need to conserve water. However, where I live now we catch water off the roof in a tank which is nearly always overflowing; and in my Bay of Plenty place the spring that feeds our houses overflows constantly 24/7, forming a little creek that meanders through the properties. What does it matter if I choose to stand in the shower for as long as I like, flush the toilet as often as I wish, or brush my teeth with running water
It's great that folks want to defend the environment - but it's sad IMHO that some of the "facts" promulgated aren't as good as they might be