Jim:
The calculator at the Roadless Gear site (the one you point to) is one of the ones I had tried. I don't think it is accurate. For example, here is a comparison:
Large pulley: 23.5"
Small pulley: 8.4"
Center distance: 25"
Road Less Gear belt length: 99.8"
Gizmology belt length: 102.4"
That's over 2-1/2" difference. If you have allowed enough adjusting range in your takeup, you'd be OK. However, I'm inclined to believe there will be other errors that creep in, too. (For example, using the flywheel dameter as the pitch diameter is wrong. The actuall pitch diameter is a little bigger than the flywheel--it runs somewhere just outside the top of the ribs in the belt.) Put them all together and you may end up buying a belt that doesn't fit. The "cheap Swede" (that's what my wife calls me), doesn't like to buy things he can't use.
As I said below, I've checked the Gizmology calculations against my CAD layout and the two of them agree exactly (out to the 4th decimal place). I am wondering if the other formulas are OK for situations where the two pulleys are about the same size, but start to become inaccurate when size differance becomes large.
At any rate, I think the lesson here is to be careful about canned formulas wherever you find them. It doesn't hurt to double check the numbers, especially if you can come up with a totally different way to do that. It's nice when you can measure actual parts to confirm (I sure wish I had my generator pulley on hand).
Best regards,
Andy Hall